Vol. 10 (2026): Identidad Bolivariana: 2da Edición Especial
Original Items

Academic Coordinators’ Participation in Graduate Tracking Feedback in Technological Institutes

Yixon Ramiro Caicedo Rodriguez
Instituto Superior Tecnológico Bolivariano de Tecnología
Ángel Yasmil Echeverría Guzmán
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Luis Abdón Rivera Paredes
Instituto Superior Tecnológico Bolivariano de Tecnología

Published 2026-08-27

Keywords

  • graduate tracking,
  • graduates,
  • academic coordinators,
  • academic management,
  • feedback

How to Cite

Academic Coordinators’ Participation in Graduate Tracking Feedback in Technological Institutes. (2026). Identidad Bolivariana, 10, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.37611/IB10ol53-61

Abstract

Graduate tracking is a key component of higher education quality assurance systems, as it provides relevant information on educational relevance and labor market insertion. This study analyzes the participation of academic coordinators in the feedback process of graduate tracking in technological institutes in Ecuador, from an academic governance and evidence-based management perspective. A mixed-methods approach with a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and descriptive design was employed. The sample consisted of 15 academic
coordinators and 3 tracking officers. Data were collected using Likert-scale surveys and semi-structured interviews, with a reliability coefficient of α = 0.75. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results show moderate participation in information review (46.7%), limited institutional articulation (29.7%), and low knowledge of institutional protocols (22.4%), despite a positive perception of graduate tracking for curriculum improvement (63.4%). It is concluded that academic coordinators’ participation remains limited, restricting the consolidation of evidence-based governance models in technological higher education.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. (2024). Impact of formative feedback on academic outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 158–172.
  2. Arteaga-Briones, L. A., Azúa-Arteaga, A. A., & López-Padrón, A. (2023). Modelo para seguimiento de graduados: Hacia el aseguramiento de la calidad de la educación superior ecuatoriana. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 29(3), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i3.40711
  3. Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., Mabel, Z., & Song, Y. (2021). Bringing transparency to predictive analytics: A systematic comparison of predictive modeling methods in higher education. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858421103763
  4. Consejo de Aseguramiento de la Calidad de la Educación Superior (CACES). (2022). Plan estratégico institucional 2022-2025. Quito, Ecuador.
  5. CRE-SER. (2018). Instrumentos para seguimiento a graduados. Ecuador.
  6. Guevara Albán, C. S., Cañizares Galarza, F. P., & Romero Fernández, A. (2019). Sistema de información para los procesos de seguimiento a graduados e inserción laboral. Uniandes EPISTEME, 6(4), 499–512.
  7. Hutchins, L. (2024). The role of feedback in professional development of educators. Journal of Higher Education, 95(3), 301–320.
  8. Instituto Superior Tecnológico del Austro. (2023). Seguimiento a graduados. Loja, Ecuador.
  9. Instituto Superior Tecnológico Libertador. (2023). Seguimiento a graduados. Quito, Ecuador.
  10. ITSQMET. (2024). Reglamento y procedimiento para seguimiento a egresados. Quito, Ecuador.
  11. Merino Gavilanes, A., & Colina Vargas, M. (2025). Aplicación de análisis temático en procesos institucionales. Ecuador.
  12. Peralta Vallejo, X. (2022). La gobernanza en las universidades públicas en la zona 6 del Ecuador: Incidencia de los stakeholders en los niveles de gestión universitaria. Escritos Contables y de Administración, 13(2), 104–142. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.eca.2022.3702
  13. Pianda, et al. (2024). Impacto de la experiencia de prácticas en la empleabilidad de los estudiantes de formación profesional: una revisión sistemática. (Referencia integrada en el estudio base).
  14. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. (2024). Estudios sobre participación institucional en procesos de seguimiento a graduados. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 30(1), 100–120.
  15. Smith, M. (2001). Writing a successful paper. The Trey Research Monthly, 53, 149–150.
  16. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (UPS). (2024). Evaluación de procesos de planificación y seguimiento académico. Quito, Ecuador.
  17. Universidad Técnica de Machala (UTMACH). (2023). Informe de resultados de seguimiento a graduados. Machala, Ecuador.
  18. Universidad Técnica del Norte. (2020). Programa de seguimiento a egresados. Ibarra, Ecuador.
  19. Web Information System and Management of the Graduate Follow-up Standard in a Public Institute of Higher Technological Education, Peru. (2023). EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.3903
  20. Zhou, Y. (2024). Educational big data initiates a new era in education development. Educational Research Review, 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100123