Vol. 10 (2026): Identidad Bolivariana: 1era Edición Especial
Original Items

A Tech-based Communicative Approach system designed to support teachers’ writing production in their lessons.

Angel Alberto Aguilera Salazar
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Johnny Segundo Campoverde Lopez
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Josué Reinaldo Bonilla Tenesaca
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador

Published 2026-05-09

Keywords

  • Communicative Approach,
  • teachers’ writing production,
  • digital tools,
  • lesson planning,
  • communicative language teaching

How to Cite

A Tech-based Communicative Approach system designed to support teachers’ writing production in their lessons. (2026). Identidad Bolivariana, 10, 234-243. https://doi.org/10.37611/IB10ol234-243

Abstract

This study introduces a Tech-based Communicative Approach (TBCA) system designed to help teachers in developing effective writing activities within their lesson planning. The system combines task-based strategies with the communicative approach principles, enabling teachers to design activities that address the requirements of actual communication as well as the CEFR levels. The TBCA supports drafting, revising, and structuring written materials with a focus on clarity, coherence, and communicative purpose. Teachers reported improvements in organizing planning objectives, instructions, and assessment criteria easier. This suggest that TBCA not only improve teachers’ professional writing but also enhances the design of interactive tasks that foster student engagement and language development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  2. Chen, W. (2020). Technology-enhanced writing instruction in EFL classrooms: Effects and perspectives. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 150–165.
  3. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.
  6. González-Lloret, M. (2020). Technology-mediated TBLT in higher education: Research and practice. John Benjamins Publishing.
  7. Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  8. Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing and teaching. Language Teaching, 52(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000323
  9. Li, M., & Zheng, C. (2021). Teachers’ digital literacy and technology integration in English language teaching: A review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1875791
  10. Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of technology-based feedback on EFL writing performance: A mixed-methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106724
  11. Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Warschauer, M., & Liaw, M.-L. (2009). Emerging technologies for autonomous language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 1–5.
  13. Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021). Digital scaffolding for EFL writing: Effects on writing performance and cognitive load. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 807–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13035