Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Identidad Bolivariana
Original Items

The denaturalization of the constitutional interpretation action in the case of single-parent adoption. Analysis of Verdict No. 8-09-IC/21.

Lissette Amelia Alvarado Ajila
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador

Published 2024-03-18

Keywords

  • single-parent adoption,
  • constitutional interpretation,
  • constitutionality control,
  • adoption

How to Cite

The denaturalization of the constitutional interpretation action in the case of single-parent adoption. Analysis of Verdict No. 8-09-IC/21. (2024). Identidad Bolivariana, 8(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.37611/IB8ol1107-114

Abstract

Opinion No. 8-09-IC/21 addresses the request for constitutional interpretation on the capacity of single individuals (single-parent families) to adopt in Ecuador. The initiative was proposed by the Institute for Children and the Family (INFA) and it was questioned whether the second paragraph of article 68 of the Constitution excludes the possibility of adoption by single people. The opinion analyzes international and infraconstitutional normative provisions; and, the periodic reports made by the competent administrative authority on how adoption is carried out in our country, which are clear, establishing that single parents can adopt. The second paragraph of article 68 of the Constitution, however, excludes the possibility of adoption by single people. Therefore, this work seeks to analyze the constitutional interpretation carried out by the constitutional court when it rejected the constitutional interpretation action, seeking a statement on the constitutionality of the infraconstitutional norms, which, in the specific case, regulate the adoption regime in Ecuador and allow the adoption of single-parent families, considering that this is an inappropriate means.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Humanos, D. U. (20 de Noviembre de 2018). Principio de inocencia. Obtenido de https://news.un.org/es/story/2018/11/1446621
  2. Medina, H. J. (15 de Marzo de 2011). Delito. Obtenido de https://repositorio.uta.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/5238/1/DER-627-2011-Zurita%20H%c3%a9ctor.pdf
  3. Oficial, R. (2014). Contrabando. Obtenido de https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/03/COIP_act_feb-2021.pdf
  4. Perez, M. J. (2010). La prueba judicial. Obtenido de https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/1135/1/T0836-MDP-Escobar-La%20valoraci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20prueba.pdf
  5. Vintimilla, S. (15 de Octubre de 2006 ). Interpretación jurídica. Obtenido de https://dspace.uazuay.edu.ec/bitstream/datos/699/1/05631.pdf