Vol. 10 (2026): Identidad Bolivariana: 1era Edición Especial
Original Items

Didactic Strategy to Develop Critical Thinking Mediated by Digital Didactic Resources Supported by Learning Analytics

Johanna Margarita Granda Solano
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Diana Yaqueline Vergara León
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Raúl López-Fernández
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Jessica María Quiroz Valdez
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador

Published 2026-05-09

Keywords

  • critical thinking,
  • teaching strategy,
  • digital resources

How to Cite

Didactic Strategy to Develop Critical Thinking Mediated by Digital Didactic Resources Supported by Learning Analytics. (2026). Identidad Bolivariana, 10, 147-157. https://doi.org/10.37611/IB10ol%p

Abstract

This research developed an innovative teaching strategy that 
promotes critical thinking in ninth-grade students through the 
structured integration of digital learning resources supported by 
learning analytics. The study adopted a qualitative approach that 
allowed for a deep understanding of students' perceptions and 
expert validation of the teaching proposal. The theoretical 
framework established that critical thinking involves a regulated 
and intelligent process of conceptualizing, analyzing, synthesizing, 
and evaluating information, and reflectively determining criteria of effectiveness and fairness: clarity, precision, relevance, logical sequence, and equity. Digital teaching resources, including 
interactive simulators, virtual labs, and gamification platforms, 
were recognized for personalizing learning pathways and fostering 
cognitive interaction. The educational assessment revealed substantial gaps in the strategic digital tools used to develop critical thinking skills, with only 25% of students believing that 
digital activities went beyond mere memorization, while 75% reported specific educational needs. The designed strategy 
integrated five fundamental methodological dimensions: problem
based learning, Socratic methods, guided conceptual analysis, 
reflective self-assessment, and educational gamification. High competence validation using the Chernoff face method with 12 experts confirmed the viability and relevance of the proposal, especially highlighting technological viability (83% positive 
evaluation) and curricular complementarity (75% approval). 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ruipérez-Valiente, J. (2020). El Proceso de Implementación de Analíticas de Aprendizaje. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 85-101.
  2. Fernández-Batanero J. et al. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 548. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548
  3. Franconeri, S., Padilla, L., Shah, P., & Zacks, J. (2021). La ciencia de la comunicación visual de datos : Qué funciona. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 61-110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211051956
  4. Garzón Asanza Adrian et al. (2022). Estudio de la Brecha Digital y el Proceso de Enseñanza - Aprendizaje en Ecuador Caso De Estudio: Universidad Técnica De Machala. Revista angolana de ciências. Obtenido de https://www.redalyc.org/journal/7041/704173394010/704173394010.pdf
  5. González, L., & Arias, M. (2022). Barreras docentes para la integración de TIC en instituciones educativas públicas: Un estudio de caso. Revista Electrónica Educare, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-1.24
  6. Hitchcock, D. (2020). Critical Thinking. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Obtenido de Fall 2020 Edition: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/critical-thinking/
  7. Huber, C., & Kuncel, N. (2020). Does College Teach Critical Thinking? A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 431-468. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919354
  8. Buendía Eisman L. et al. (1998). Métodos de investigación en psicopedagogía. Mcgraw-Hill/Interamericana de España, S. A. U.
  9. López Fernández Raúl et al. (2023). Valoraciones teóricas sobre el concepto de analítica del aprendizaje. Mendive.
  10. Nuñez Reyes, J. (2010). Ideas para el uso de las caras de Chernoff en la cartografía escolar. Boletim de Geografia, 5-15.
  11. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Recuperado el 21 de 08 de 2025, de https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf
  12. Sáiz , C., & Rivas, S. (2021). Evaluation of a program for the development of critical thinking skills in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 467-484.
  13. Tsai Y. et al. (2020). Learning analytics in European higher education—Trends and barriers. Computers & Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933
  14. Valle Lima, A. (2007). Metamodelos de la investigación pedagógica. La Habana.