Vol. 10 (2026): Identidad Bolivariana: 2da Edición Especial
Original Items

The Use of the ESP to Improve Speaking Skills in A2 Level Learners

Paola Carolina Cabrera Zuleta
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Johnny Segundo Campoverde Lopez
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Josué Reinaldo Bonilla Tenesaca
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador

Published 2026-09-17 — Updated on 2026-09-17

Versions

Keywords

  • English for Specific Purposes,
  • oral skills,
  • A2 learners,
  • communicative tasks,
  • motivation

How to Cite

The Use of the ESP to Improve Speaking Skills in A2 Level Learners. (2026). Identidad Bolivariana, 10, 238-247. https://doi.org/10.37611/IB10ol238-247

Abstract

In today’s globalized academic and professional settings, proficiency in English has become an essential requirement. According to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), A2- level learners are classified as Basic Users who require continuous support to effectively develop the four core language skills: listening, reading, speaking, and writing. Among these, speaking often represents the greatest challenge. Consequently, this study aims to explore how the English for Specific Purposes (ESP) approach can be implemented as a pedagogical strategy to enhance the oral proficiency of A2-level students by aligning learning tasks with authentic academic and professional needs. The research employs a mixed-methods design, integrating literature review, deductive and inductive analysis, and data collection through pre- and post-tests, perception surveys, semi-structured interviews, and evaluation rubrics aligned with CEFR standards.
The materials and activities were adapted to replicate workplace communication, emphasizing domain- specific vocabulary and interactive tasks such as role plays. The findings reveal notable progress in fluency, pronunciation, use of technical terminology, and learner motivation, demonstrating that the ESP approach constitutes an effective pedagogical strategy for fostering oral communicative competence in technical and professional contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: Status quo, critique, and future directions. The Modern Language Journal, 102(4), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12510
  2. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526
  3. Cabrera Chávez, A. M., Campoverde López, J. S., & Bonilla Tenesaca, J. R. (2025). Influence of professional internships on developing speaking skills at A2 level. Arandu UTIC, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v12i1.609
  4. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
  5. Coxhead, A. (2018). Vocabulary and English for specific purposes research: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 124–139). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315162343
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  8. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42
  9. Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108694238
  10. Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.290
  11. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Saying what we mean: Making a case for “language acquisition” to become “language development.” Language Teaching, 48(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000019
  13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
  14. Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118884349
  15. Min, J. (2020). English for specific purposes education in university contexts: A research synthesis. TESL Reporter, 53(1).
  16. Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891704
  17. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691773384
  18. Skehan, P. (2018). Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629761
  19. Trujeque-Moreno, G., Álvarez-Álvarez, G., & García-García, J. (2021). English for specific purposes and communicative needs. ESP Today, 9(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2021.9.1.7
  20. Xhaferi, B., & Bekteshi, E. (2020). An analysis of English for specific purposes among university students. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(2), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2020.92.2