Vol. 7 No. 3 (2023): Identidad Bolivariana: Special Edition
Original Items

Instructional design in EFLT. A challenge and an innovation in teaching and learning english

Josué Bonilla Tenesaca
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador
Isabel Batista Medina
Universidad de Oriente
Diana Egas Herrera
Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador

Published 2023-12-29

Keywords

  • Instructional Design,
  • EFLT

How to Cite

Instructional design in EFLT. A challenge and an innovation in teaching and learning english. (2023). Identidad Bolivariana, 7(3), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.37611/IB7ol341-54

Abstract

Many instructional design (ID) methods are elaborated to encompass diverse learning problems in different spheres of human activity. Thus, English Language teaching requires innovations and the conscientious application of ID theories; therefore, it is the purpose of this paper to share important issues on ID, which may lead to the redesign of English classes with the application of action/classroom research, one of its cornerstones, which may bring about progress, improvements and facilitation of English learning. The procedures used were the analysis, interpretation, and design of different scientific materials related with the application of ID principles, teaching/learning strategies, students’ profiles, and criteria of CEFR, which may lead to achieving satisfaction of the students´ needs in the different educational sub-systems of Ecuador.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. AskERIC (1999). An AskERIC Write-A-Lesson Plan Guide, available online at www.askeric.org
  2. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978): Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  3. Bailey, K. (2001). Action Research, Teacher Research, and Classroom Research. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language.
  4. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: Longman
  5. Brown. D (2005): Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education. USA
  6. Briggs, L.J., K.L. Gustafson, and M.H. Tillman (1991): Instructional Design: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications, Inc.,
  7. Council of Europe. (2018): Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-referencelanguages/home/
  8. Dick, W. & Carey, L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction (4th ed.), New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
  9. Gagné, R., et al. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design, TX: HBJ College Publishers.
  10. IEEE (2001). Reference Guide for Instructional Design and Development, available online at www.ieee.org Richards
  11. Reigeluth, C. M.,(1083) ed. Instructional Design Theories and Models. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  12. Van Merriënboer, et al,(2002): Mental models as a new foundation for Instructional Design and Educational Technology